Authors are solicited to contribute to the conference by submitting articles that illustrate research results, projects, surveying works and industrial experiences that describe significant advances in the following areas but are not limited to:
Machine Learning Foundations |
Deep Learning and Data Engineering |
Machine Learning and Data Engineering |
Applications |
Policies
Submission:
Please submit your full papers or abstracts via: https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=amlds2025 before February 10, 2025. Acceptance or rejection of full papers will be notified before March 10, 2025. For detailed guideline for submission, please click.
Changes of title/abstract/authorship:
Authors should include a full title for their paper, as well as a complete paper by the paper submission deadline. Submission titles should not be modified after the paper submission deadline. Submissions violating these rules may be deleted after the paper submission deadline without reviewing.
Double-Blind Review:
Dual Submission:
It is not appropriate to submit papers that are identical (or substantially similar) to versions that have been previously published, accepted for publication, or submitted in parallel to other conferences or journals. Such submissions violate our dual submission policy, and the organizers have the right to reject such submissions, or to remove them from the proceedings. Note that submissions that have been or are being presented at workshops do not violate the dual-submission policy, as long as there’s no associated archival publication.
Reviewing Criteria:
Accepted papers must be based on original research and must contain novel results of significant interest to the machine learning community. Results can be either theoretical or empirical. Results will be judged on the degree to which they have been objectively established and/or their potential for scientific and technological impact. Reproducibility of results and easy availability of code will be taken into account in the decision-making process whenever appropriate. To put concisely: The reviewers needs to help select papers that provide new ideas that others can both understand and benefit from. To that effect, we ask you to review papers on six (6) basic criteria: 1. Relevance to conference; 2. Originality; Clarity/Quality of English; 3. References; 4. Length of Paper; 5. Potential Value; 6. Comments & Feedback.
Ethics:
Authors and members of the program committee, including reviewers, are expected to follow standard ethical guidelines. Plagiarism in any form is strictly forbidden .